Saturday, November 11, 2023

ECG Video Blog #403 (220) — Ps,Qs,3Rs Approach to this Tachycardia ...


======================================

 — CLICK HERE — for a Video presentation of this case! (22 minutes)

  • Below are slides used in my video presentation.
  • For full discussion of this case — See ECG Blog #220 —

======================================



The long lead II rhythm strip shown in Figure-1 was obtained from an 51-year-old man who presented to the ED (Emergency Department) with "palpitations" that began 1 hour earlier.

  • HOW would you interpret this tracing?
  • Clinically — What would YOU do?


Figure-1: Long lead II rhythm strip, obtained from an 51-year-old man with palpitations.













Figure: The Ps, Qs, 3R Approach to Rhythm Interpretation.

 

















 

Figure: I've labeled Figure-1 to illustrate estimation of heart rate (by the "every-third-beat" Method) — and — assessment of QRS duration (the solid PURPLE box showing that onset and offset of the QRS measures at least 0.12 second).













 

Figure: 12-lead ECG obtained from an 51-year-old man with palpitations.





Figure: Use of the "3 Simple Rules" for distinction between SVT vs VT (taken from ECG Blog #196).


 


Figure: Lead II rhythm strips obtained during the WCT rhythm (Panel A) — and immediately after synchronized cardioversion with 100 joules (the RED arrow shows the point where cardioversion was applied). Panel B — was obtained moments after cardioversion.

 




Figure: Following treatment with Atropine — the patient stabilized, and this 12-lead ECG was obtained.





 

=======================================


Additional Material on Today's CASE:


 

Today’s ECG Media PEARL #37 (6:00 minutes Audio) — Reviews how to determine IF Your Patient with an Arrhythmia is Hemodynamically Stable!

 



Figure: Use of lead V1 for assessing QRS morphology during a WCT rhythm (taken from ECG Blog #196).

 


 

=======================

Related ECG Blog Posts to Today’s Case: 

  • ECG Blog #185 — Reviews my System for Rhythm Interpretation, using the Ps, Qs & 3R Approach.
  • ECG Blog #210 — Reviews the Every-Other-Beat (or Every-Third-Beat) Method for estimation of fast heart rates — and discusses another case of a regular WCT rhythm.
  • ECG Blog #196 — Reviews another Case with a Regular WCT Rhythm. 
  • ECG Blog #197 — Reviews the concept of Idiopathic VT, of which Fascicular VT is one of the 2 most common types. 
  • ECG Blog #204 — Reviews the ECG diagnosis of the Bundle Branch Blocks (RBBB/LBBB/IVCD). 
  • ECG Blog #203 — Reviews ECG diagnosis of Axis and the Hemiblocks. For review of QRS morphology with the Bifascicular Blocks (RBBB/LAHB; RBBB/LPHB) — See the video ECG Media Pearl #21 in this blog post.
  • ECG Blog #211 — WHY does Aberrant Conduction occur?







Saturday, November 4, 2023

ECG Blog #402 — Will Adenosine Convert This?


You are told that the patient next door is in the regular SVT (SupraVentricular Tachycardia) rhythm shown in Figure-1.


QUESTIONS:

  • Is the rhythm AVNRT or AVRT?  
  • Is Adenosine likely to convert this rhythm?


Figure-1: How would YOU interpret this ECG?

MY Thoughts on the ECG in Figure-1:
When faced with a challenging cardiac arrhythmia — It is a "luxury" to have access to a long lead rhythm strip containing 3 simultaneously-recorded leads. This provides the optimal chance that QRS size and atrial activity (if present) will be readily detectable.

PEARL #1: The 3 leads I favor for rhythm determination are precisely the leads that are shown in Figure-1. These are: 
  • Lead II — which is clearly the BEST lead in most cases for visualing P waves and/or other atrial activity. Sinus rhythm is defined by the presence of an upright P wave with constant PR interval in lead II.
  • Lead V1 — which is the 2nd-best lead for visualizing P waves (although the P wave will not necessarily be upright in lead V1 with sinus rhythm). Lead V1 offers the best perspective of right-sided QRS morphology.
  • Lead V5 — which offers an excellent perspective of left-sided QRS morphology.

And then I took a closer LOOK — at the rhythm in Figure-1.

==============================

QUESTION:
  • Is the rhythm in Figure-1 truly regular?
  •    — HINT: Before answering — LOOK at Figure-2.

Figure-2: Is the rhythm truly regular? (See text).


Is Today's Rhythm Truly Regular?
Although today's rhythm looks regular — it is not completely regular, as I highlight in Figure-2:
  • Even without calipers — Doesn't it appear that the R-R intervals within the RED dotted ovals are a little bit longer than the R-R intervals within the BLUE ovals? This establishes that the rhythm is irregularly irregular. Otherwise:

  • The rate of today's rhythm is fast (close to ~150/minute).
  • The QRS complex is narrow in all 12 leads.
  • Although difficult to assess atrial activity given all of the baseline artifact — it appears that no P waves are seen.

  • Therefore: The finding of an irregularly irregular rhythm with a narrow QRS complex, and the complete absence of P waves — establishes the diagnosis as AFib (Atrial Fibrillation), here with a rapid ventricular response.
  • Otherwise — the axis is normal — R wave progression is appropriate — there is no chamber enlargement — and some nonspecific ST depression is seen in the lateral chest leads that is probably rate-related.

PEARL #2:
 When the rate of AFib is rapid — this irregular tachycardia may look regular when it is not. 
  • That the rhythm is AFib — is easier to appreciate in Figure-3.

Figure-3: Today's rhythm is not regular (See text).

Figure-3 shows Today's Rhythm is Not Regular
The double RED arrows that I've drawn near the middle of the long lead V5 rhythm strip are all the same length.
  • Although extremely subtle — the 5 double arrows in the top 2 rows of the long lead V5 rhythm strip — are each a little bit shorter than the 2 double arrows in the lower row.


The CASE Continues:
Today's patient was treated with IV, and then PO Metoprolol. The repeat ECG after this treatment is shown in Figure-4.
  • Following treatment with a ß-blocker — the rate of today's rhythm has slowed considerably. Although baseline artifact remains — it should be evident that no P waves are present.
  • The irregular irregularity of today's rhythm in Figure-4 is now obvious. Clearly, the rhythm is AFib — here with a controlled ventricular response.
  • Note that the ST depression that was previously seen in the lateral chest leads of Figure-3 — has now resolved, confirming that this ST depression was indeed rate-related.

Figure-4: Repeat ECG after IV and PO Metoprolol.


Would Adenosine have Worked for Today's Rhythm?
Adenosine was not used in today's case. Instead — rate control of this patient's AFib, as well as confirmation of this rhythm diagnosis was obtained by treatment with a ß-blocker.
  • To EMPHASIZE: It would be extremely easy not to realize that the rapid SVT (SupraVentricular Tachycardia) rhythm that today's patient presented with was irregular — because (as per PEARL #2) — When AFib is rapid, it may look quite regular. Clinically, this is usually not problematic — since initial emergency treatment of many SVT rhythms is similar.

The above said — When possible, optimal management of SVT rhythms is much easier to achieve when you know what the specific rhythm diagnosis is.
  • ECG Blog #240 — reviews my approach to the ECG assessment of regular SVT rhythms.

  • Adenosine — is a wonderful drug for emergency treatment of reentry SVTs. Even in cases in which Adenosine does not convert the rhythm — it will often facilitate rhythm diagnosis by its transient rate-slowing effect. Although the drug is usually safe (because of its ultra-short half-life) — side effects can occur, and these are not uniformly short-lived. Therefore — Adenosine is probably best avoided for treatment of rhythms for which the drug has little to no chance of being effective (ie, If you know that the SVT you are treating is AFib — then its better to use some other rate-slowing or antiarrhythmic agent — rather than risking side effects from a drug that is unlikely to work).

  • See Figure-5 and -6 — for more on Adenosine.   


Figure-5: Pages 1 and 2 on Pros & Cons of using Adenosine (excerpted from my ACLS-2013-ePub).

 


Figure-6: Pages 3 and 4 on Pros & Cons of using Adenosine (excerpted from my ACLS-2013-ePub).



==================================

Acknowledgment: My appreciation to Mubarak Al-Hatemi (from Qatar) for the case and this tracing. 

==================================


Related ECG Blog Posts to Today’s Case:

  • ECG Blog #205 — Reviews my Systematic Approach to 12-lead ECG Interpretation.
  • ECG Blog #185 — Reviews the Ps, Qs, 3R Approach to Rhythm Interpretation.

  • ECG Blog #240 — Reviews the approach to a regular SVT rhythm.







Saturday, October 28, 2023

ECG Blog #401 — What Kind of Block?


The ECG in Figure-1 was obtained from an elderly woman — who presented to the ED (Emergency Department) for dyspnea on exertion over recent weeks. 
  • What are YOUR "Quick Thoughts" about this case?

Figure-1: The initial ECG in today's case. (To improve visualization — I've digitized the original ECG using PMcardio).


MY "Quick Thoughts" on Today's CASE:
The ECG in Figure-1 is highly concerning — so it is indeed fortunate that this elderly woman came to the ED when she did!
  • The rhythm in Figure-1 is complex — and defies precise interpretation without careful study. That said — obvious findings include: i) Marked bradycardia! — ii) Tiny-but-definitely present P waves in the long lead V1 rhythm strip — which at 1st glance look like they may (?) be regular! — iii) Non-conduction of a number of these regular P waves — suggesting at least some form of significant AV block; — and, iv) At least 3 different QRS morphologies (if not more) — which considering that the lead monitored is lead V1, may represent variations of normal, RBBB and LBBB conduction! (Right and Left Bundle Branch Block conduction).

  • PEARL #1: The goal of clinical ECG interpretation of a tracing such as this one is to expedite interpretation of "the essentials" — and to leave details of the ECG and rhythm strip shown in Figure-1 until later, when time is available. I therefore intentionally did not dive deeper than the  4 general conclusions noted above in the 1st bullet — which took me no more than seconds to arrive at! My Immediate Impression — was that this elderly woman with a several week history of symptoms would most likely leave the hospital with a pacemaker.

PEARL #2:
 Interpretation of the 12-lead ECG in Figure-1 is no easy task! This is because there are multiple QRS morphologies — and we do not yet know which are supraventricular (nor with what kind of conduction propoerties).  That said — LOOK to see if there is an underlying rhythm!

  • Beats #5 and #7 look to be narrow and are both preceded by P waves with a constant and normal PR interval. This suggests that beats #5 and #7 are probably normal sinus-conducted beats. This means that we can assess ST-T wave morphology for ischemic changes in simultaneously-recorded leads V1,V2,V3 for beat #5 — and in leads V4,V5,V6 for beat #7.

  • There is deep, symmetric T wave inversion with a prolonged QTc interval in anterior leads V1,V2,V3. This suggests ischemia of uncertain duration.
  • The ST-T wave appearance in leads V4,V5,V6 is less worrisome — with shallow T inversion in V4 — and ST segment flattening with slight depression in leads V5,V6 — but which does not look acute.

  • Beyond-the-Core: Advanced interpreters may already suspect that beat #2 in the long lead V1 rhythm strip is sinus-conducted with RBBB (given its rSR' morphology in lead V1 — and being preceded by the same PR interval before this beat as was seen for sinus beats #5 and 7). 
  • Similarly — Advanced interpreters may also suspect that beat #4 in the long lead V1 is sinus-conducted with LBBB (given its all negative QRS in lead V1, and its monophasic positive morphology in lead aVL — also preceded by the same PR interval as for the other sinus-conducted beats).
  • The "good news" — is that ST-T wave appearance in simultaneously-recorded leads I,II,III for beat #2 — and in leads aVR,aVL,aVF for beat #4 — does not look acute.

IMPRESSION of Today’s Tracing:
The main problem in today's case of this elderly woman with a several week history of dyspnea on exertion — is the markedly bradycardic rhythm with some form of AV block. 
  • Given this patient's older age — if nothing "fixable" is found, she most likely has SSS (Sick Sinus Syndrome) and will need a pacemaker (See ECG Blog #342 for more on SSS).
  • Given the history of dyspnea on exertion over a several week period (but no mention of chest pain) — and — the finding of deep, symmetric T wave inversion in the anterior leads (as per Pearl #2) — it is possible that the onset of her symptoms is the result of a "Silent MI" (See ECG Blog #228 for more on "Silent" MI). 
  • KEY Point: As fascinating as today’s rhythm disorder is — a detailed explanation for the mechanism of this rhythm is not needed for optimal clinical management. Instead — the clinical points summarized in the above 2 bullets suffice! That said — I believe appreciation of the probable mechanism for today's rhythm is instructive, and reinforces our interpretation. For those with an interest in learning more — Follow along with me below!

=================================

Looking Closer at Today's Rhythm:
Regardless of whether you recognized the advanced points I raised above under "Beyond-the-Core" — the KEY is to recognize the marked bradycardia with some form of significant AV block, with need for referral for possible (probable) pacemaker implantation.
  • CREDIT if you also recognized the deep, symmetric anterior T wave inversion — suggestive of possible "silent MI" several weeks earlier at the time this patient's symptoms began.

Next Steps for Determination of the Rhythm:
  • The easiest next step in interpretation — is to label P waves in the long lead V1 rhythm strip. It is because of the small amplitude of P wave deflections in this lead — that calipers so greatly facilitate (and speed up) detection of atrial activity.

  • PEARL #3: I've labeled with RED arrows in Figure-2 — the P waves in the long lead V1 rhythm strip. Some of these P waves are partially hidden within some of the T waves. This is precisely where calipers assist: — Select 2 P waves in a row that you definitely see. Then "walk out" this caliper setting throughout the entire lead V1 rhythm strip.

  • PEARL #4: Take another LOOK at the long lead V1 rhythm strip in Figure-2. Now that all P waves are labeled — Isn't it much easier to appreciate that the PR intervals before beats #1,2; 4; 5; 6; 7; and 8 are all the same! This tells us that despite the different QRS morphologies — each of these beats is sinus-conducted!

Figure-2: I've labeled all P waves in today's rhythm with RED arrows.

WHY so many QRS Morphologies?
I've already alluded to why there are multiple QRS morphologies. LOOK at Figure-3 — in which I've added colored labels to facilitate discussion.
  • RED arrows in Figure-3 highlight sinus-conducted P waves — because each of the QRS complexes that follow these P waves (ie, beats #1,2,4,5,6,7 and 8) is preceded by a constant and normal PR interval.

  • YELLOW arrow P waves are not conducted. It should be apparent that there is "high-grade" 2nd-degree AV block — because in the presence of a regular atrial rhythm, we see several instances in which consecutive YELLOW arrow P waves do not conduct despite adequate opportunity to do so (See ECG Blog #399 — for more on "high-grade" AV block).

  • I distinguish the remaining P wave with a BLUE arrow — because this P wave has a longer PR interval than all of the RED arrow P waves — and is followed by a non-conducted (ie, YELLOW arrow) P wave after beat #3. This suggests that beats #2 and #3 form a 3:2 cycle of AV Wenckebach (ie, Mobitz I 2nd-degree AV block).
 
I have also labeled the different QRS morphologies in Figure-3:
  • PEARL #5: The beauty of having a 12-lead ECG with a simultaneously-recorded long lead rhythm strip below it — is that this provides us with "4 looks" at QRS morphology for each of the 8 beats in today's rhythm.

  • Beats #1,4,6 and 8 — all look similar in the long lead V1 rhythm strip (ie, they all manifest a wide negative QRS complex). The reason that I know this is consistent with LBBB conduction — is that we see the typical all-positive, wide upright QRS for beat #1 in simultaneously-recorded lead I — for beat #4 in lead aVL — and for beat #8 in lead V6. QRS morphology for beat #6 is also consistent with LBBB conduction — because the QRS is predominantly negative in each of the anterior leads.
  • Beat #2 is consistent with RBBB conduction — because it manifests an rSR' in the long lead V1 — with a wide terminal S wave in simultaneously-recorded lateral lead I.
  • I also labeled beat #3 as consistent with RBBB conduction — because of its similarity to the QRS appearance of beat #2 in the long lead V1 rhythm strip.
  • Beat #5 is not wide, but manifests a small r' deflection in the long lead V1 — so this beat most probably reflects incomplete RBBB conduction.

  • PEARL #6: Indication for permanent pacing is justified in today's case on multiple grounds, including: i) This elderly patient with marked bradycardia has been symptomatic for weeks; ii) Her rhythm is high-grade 2nd-degree AV block; and, iii) There is alternating BBB (Bundle Branch Block) — which of itself is indication of severe conduction system disease at risk of developing ventricular standstill. 

Figure-3: I've added colored labels of P waves and QRS complexes to facilitate discussion of conduction properties (See text).


=================================
Laddergram Illustration:
At this point — I needed to work out, and then draw a laddergram that I could then verify to ensure a plausible mechanism for today's arrhythmia.
  • Sequential legends over the next 4 Figures illustrate my thought process. (See ECG Blog #188 for review on how to read and/or draw Laddergrams).

  • To EMPHASIZE: Today's laddergram was challenging. I fully acknowledge needing several attempts until I could finally derive a plausible mechanism involving dual-level block out of the AV node. That said — my hope is that even readers with limited experience with laddergrams will be able to follow the mechanism I propose in my final Figure-7.
=================================

Beginning the Laddergram:

Figure-4: It is usually easiest to begin a laddergram by marking the path of sinus P waves through the Atrial Tier (as per the RED lines drawn directly below the onset of each of the P waves — as shown here by the large GREEN arrows). Note that these RED lines in the Atrial Tier are nearly vertical — since conduction of sinus P waves through the atria is rapid. Note also that the P-P interval between successive P waves (vertical RED lines) is similar, albeit not quite equal (ie,There is slight sinus arrhythmia).




Figure-5: The most challenging part of most laddergrams is construction of the AV Nodal Tier — so I typically save that for last. Therefore, after drawing in all P waves into the Atrial Tier — It's easiest to next add in the Ventricular Tier the indication of all QRS complexes that are conducted. Perhaps the most complex aspect of today's rhythm — is realization that despite the changing QRS morphologies — each of the 8 beats in the long lead V1 rhythm strip are sinus-conducted beats! The large GREEN arrows show that I use the onset of each QRS complex as my landmark for entering beats #1-thru-8 into the Ventricular Tier.




Figure-6: As noted — each of the 8 beats in today's rhythm are sinus-conducted beats, albeit with different conduction properties! To better illustrate normal, RBBB or LBBB conduction — I've added light BLUE and PINK butt ends into the Ventricular Tier to schematically show the conduction defects. With completion of the Atrial and Ventricular Tiers — I was ready to begin solving the laddergram — which entailed postulating which of the P waves from the Atrial Tier would be able to make it through the AV Nodal Tier to be conducted to the ventricles. 


=================================
PEARL #7: Because of the complexity of today's rhythm — I went through some trail-and-error before arriving at the laddergram I propose below in Figure-7. Two KEY principles figured in my arriving at this laddergram:
  • Principle #1: It is extremely unusual for a patient to alternate between Mobitz I and Mobitz II. As a result — IF there is clear evidence of 2nd-degree AV block, Mobitz Type I somewhere on the tracing you are interpreting (or somewhere in other recently-obtained telemetry monitoring rhythm strips) — then it becomes highly likely that some form of Wenckebach conduction is responsible for other unknown forms of AV block that you see on that patient's ECG. 
  • As noted earlier — the increasing PR interval from beat #2-to-beat #3, followed by the non-conducted (YELLOW arrow) P wave after beat #3 — is consistent with a 3:2 cycle of AV Wenckebach (ie, Mobitz I 2nd-degree AV block). This makes it highly likely that the 2:1 block of beats #1,4,5,6,7 and 8 are also a manifestation of Wenckebach conduction.

  • Principle #2: Simple AV Wenckebach results in non-conduction of a single on-time P wave. But as per the YELLOW arrow P waves in Figure-7 — we see consecutive on-time, non-conducted P waves within several of the R-R intervals — which strongly suggests there is dual-level block out of the AV node! (See ECG Blog #347 for more on dual-level AV Wenckebach).
=================================

Putting It All Together:
  • As discussed in ECG Blog #347 — the DOTTED line in the AV Nodal Tier in Figure-7 schematically illustrates the 2 levels of exit block out of the AV Node.
  • We know that beats #2 and 3 are conducted to the ventricles in a 3:2 AV Wenckebach cycle.
  • We know that beats #1,4,5,6,7 and 8 are also all conducted beats, albeit with alternating bundle branch block.
  • This leaves us with having to postulate a path of transmission for each of the non-conducted (YELLOW arrow) P waves — in which the 3 R-R intervals that contain consecutive YELLOW arrow P waves — must manifest block of 1 of these P waves at each of the 2 levels within the AV Nodal Tier (which I schematically show in Figure-7).

Figure-7: My proposed laddergram for today's complex rhythm.

==================================

CASE Follow-Up:
Following assessment of this patient's initial rhythm — she was admitted to a monitored floor with plans for pacemaker placement. Unfortunately, before this could be accomplished — the patient went into cardiac arrest. She was successfully resuscitated — with a post-arrest rhythm similar to that seen in Figure-1.
  • Cardiac cath did not reveal significant coronary disease! So although I initially suspected that the deep anterior T wave inversion in the 12-lead tracing shown in Figure-1 (in association with the several week history of dyspnea) might reflect the occurence of a "silent" infarction at the time this patient's symptoms began — the negative cath argues against this. Instead — the negative cath favors more of a pure history of SSS (Sick Sinus Syndrome) in this elderly woman (See ECG Blog #342 for more on SSS — and ECG Blog #228 for more on "Silent" MI).

  • A permanent pacemaker was placed.


As always — I welcome questions and/or comments on today's ECG Blog post! THANK YOU for your interest! 


==================================
Acknowledgment: My appreciation to Hans Helseth  (from Minnesota, USA) for the case and this tracing (and CREDIT to Hans for his well-drawn laddergram that I have slightly modified).
==================================

Related ECG Blog Posts to Today’s Case:

  • ECG Blog #205 — Reviews my Systematic Approach to 12-lead ECG Interpretation.
  • ECG Blog #185 — Reviews the Ps, Qs, 3R Approach to Rhythm Interpretation.

  • ECG Blog #188 — Reviews how to read and draw Laddegrams (with LINKS to more than 90 laddergram cases — many with step-by-step sequential illustration).

  • ECG Blog #192 — The 3 Causes of AV Dissociation.
  • ECG Blog #191 — Reviews the difference between AV Dissociation vs Complete AV Block.

  • ECG Blog #389 — ECG Blog #373 — and ECG Blog #344 — for review of some cases that illustrate "AV block problem-solving".

  • ECG Blog #259 — Reviews the concept of Dual-Level AV Block.
  • The October 25, 2021 post in Dr. Smith's ECG Blog — My Comment (at the bottom of the page) reviews my approach to another case of a Dual-Level Wenckebach block. 
  • ECG Blog #226 — Works through a complex Case Study (including an 11:00 minute ECG Video Pearl that walks you through step-by-step in the construction of a laddergram with Wenckebach conduction and dual-level block within the AV node).
  • ECG Blog #243 — Reviews a case of AFlutter with Dual-Level Wenckebach out of the AV Node.

 
ADDENDUM (10/28/2023):



This 15-minute ECG Video (Media PEARL #52) — Reviews the 3 Types of 2nd-Degree AV Block — plus — the hard-to-define term of "high-grade" AV block. I supplement this material with the following 2 PDF handouts.
  • Section 2F (6 pages = the "short" Answer) from my ECG-2014 Pocket Brain book provides quick written review of the AV Blocks.
  • Section 20 (54 pages = the "long" Answer) from my ACLS-2013-Arrhythmias Expanded Version provides detailed discussion of WHAT the AV Blocks are — and what they are not!




ECG Media PEARL #71 (5:45 minutes Audio) — Reviews the phenomenon of Dual-Level Wenckebach out of the AV Node (HOW to recognize this phenomenon — and how to distinguish it from Mobitz II).