Sunday, February 12, 2012

ECG Blog #37 — AFib and Lead Reversal?

I discovered the 12-lead ECG shown in Figure 1 in “the files”. It was obtained from a patient who was hemodynamically stable despite the rapid rate. Unfortunately – I have no follow-up. Three diagnoses should come to mind on review of this tracing. The first two diagnoses should be thought of within seconds; the 3rd on some reflection. 
  • What 2 diagnoses should immediately come to mind? 
  • What is the 3rd diagnosis that should become apparent on reflection of QRS morphology in the various leads? 
  • Imagine a scenario of a young adult presenting with this 12-lead ECG and having palpitations, but being otherwise stable. How might you proceed clinically? 

Figure 1 – 12-lead ECG from a young adult who is stable despite the rapid rate. What 3 diagnoses should be considered? 



INTERPRETATION: The rhythm is exceeding rapid and irregular. No P waves are seen. The QRS is wide. The rhythm therefore qualifies as an irregular WCT (Wide-Complex Tachycardia). As discussed in detail in ECG Blog #36 – the underlying rhythm of this irregular WCT without P waves is AFib (Atrial Fibrillation) – which is the 1st diagnosis to be made that we allude to. Additional points we highlight about this rhythm include the following: 
  • Although VT (Ventricular Tachycardia) may at times be slightly irregular – We exclude VT from our differential diagnosis of Figure 1 because of the marked persistent irregularity seen on this tracing (with some R-R intervals being almost twice the duration of others). 
  • The rate of the AFib seen in Figure 1 is much faster than usual – attaining 250-to-300/minute in various parts of the tracing (in which the R-R interval appears to be no more than 1 large box in duration). This is clearly too fast for conduction to be proceeding down the normal AV nodal pathway. Therefore – there must be an AP (Accessory Pathway) that allows AFib impulses to bypass the AV node. The finding of AFib with QRS widening and an exceedingly rapid rate (>220/minute in parts of the tracing) is virtually diagnostic of WPW (Wolff-Parksinson-White) syndrome, which is the 2nd diagnosis to be made from Figure 1. 
  • The importance of distinguishing the common form of rapid AFib (with rates in the 120-180/minute range) from excessively rapid AFib with WPW – lies with recommendations for treatment. The usual AV nodal blocking drugs recommended for controlling the ventricular response of rapid AFib are contraindicated when AFib occurs in association with WPW. Thus – verapamil, diltiazem, digoxin (and possibly β-blockers) may all potentially accelerate forward (antidromic) conduction down the AP, thereby further increasing the already excessively rapid rate, thereby predisposing to deterioration to ventricular fibrillation. 
  • Recommended treatment of very rapid AFib with WPW includes procainamide, amiodarone, and ibutilide (See references below for additional discussion of treatment options). Immediate cardioversion is indicated if hemodynamic decompensation occurs at any time during the treatment process. 

------------------------------------------------------
About the 3rd Diagnosis in Figure 1: Careful review of QRS morphology in Figure 1 should suggest a 3rd diagnosis = lead misplacement! Overall QRS appearance simply does not make sense … 
  • Five of the 6 limb leads are decidedly negative – yet the QRS deflection in lead aVF is positive. This can’t be … 
  • R wave progression in the 6 precordial leads is totally erratic – going from entirely positive (in V1) – to entirely negative (by V2) back to positive and then again negative by the time one reaches lead V6. Again – this can’t be … 
  • Steurer, Brugada et al have provided us with 3 clues to help rule out AP conduction with WPW (See References below). These clues are: i) A negative QRS in V4-to-V6 (implies an apical origin of the tachycardia – and since all accessory pathways enter the base of the ventricles, AP conduction is excluded); ii) A QR complex in any of the 5 leads, V2-to-V6; and iii) the presence of more QRS complexes than P waves (since in any form of preexcited tachycardia the atria are involved in every beat). In Figure 1 – a QR is seen in lead V3; and a QS is seen in lead V6 – yet we know that Figure 1 has to represent AP conduction during AFib in a patient with WPW (since there is no other logical explanation for the excessively rapid rate). The reason for inconsistency with the Steurer/Brugada criteria has to be erroneous lead placement. 
IMPRESSION: Despite my lack of follow-up on this case – this 12-lead ECG is highly instructive on a number of important issues including: i) Presumed diagnosis of WPW from the finding of excessively rapid AFib with QRS widening (with associated clinical implications for treatment); ii) Awareness of Steurer/Brugada criteria for ruling out AP conduction in WCT rhythms; and iii) Need for vigilance in assessing QRS morphology for picking up less commonly recognized forms of lead misplacement (the ECG technician in this case was doubtlessly more scared than the patient by the excessively rapid rate – ergo, my explanation for this bizarre manifestation of leads that simply do not make anatomic sense). 


------------------------------------------------------
BONUS: For Those Who Do Not Believe All They Read – There is a reason why QRS morphology shown in Figure 1 made NO sense – namely, that the tracing was inexplicably rotated by 180 degrees. Figure 2 now shows correct lead placement after rotation of the tracing by 180 degrees. Note a much more plausible QRS morphology with now easy-to-decipher delta waves.

Figure 2 – Correct orientation for the 12-lead ECG in this case (after rotating Figure 1 by 180 degrees). The characteristic picture of very rapid AFib with WPW (and obvious delta waves) is now apparent.


BOTTOM LINE: The original tracing in Figure 1 represents one more way in which leads may be mislabeled. While recognition of very rapid AFib with WPW was possible when leads were mislabeled (as discussed above) – the ECG picture makes much more sense with correct orientation of all 12 leads as shown in Figure 2. 
  • MORAL of the Story – Not all tracings "in the files" are correctly labeled.
  • Special Credit – to Jason Roediger, CCT, CRAT (from Richmond, VA) for not being fooled for a second by the ECG in Figure 1.

------------------------------------------------------
REFERENCES: 
  • Steurer G, Gursoy S, Brugada P, et al: The Differential Diagnosis on the ECG between VT and Preexcited Tachycardia. Clin Cardiol 17:306-308, 1994. 
  • Marriott HJ: Emergency Electrocardiography (Trinity Press, Naples, FL, 1997 – pg 71). 
------------------------------------------------------
  • See ECG Blog #18 and Blog #36 – and Section 12.0 (from ACLS-2013-ePub) on Management of Very Rapid AFib with WPW. 
  • See ECG Blog #76 – for Review of How to Localize the AP (Accessory Pathway) from the surface ECG.




Saturday, February 4, 2012

ECG Interpretation Review #36: (WCT - VT - A Fib - Irregular VT - WPW - Wide Tachycardia)

One of the most challenging tasks faced by emergency care providers is assessment and management of the patient with a stable WCT (Wide-Complex Tachycardia). When the QRS complex is wide — the rhythm is regular — and no P waves are seen – then VT (Ventricular Tachycardia) is the presumed diagnosis (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Regular WCT without definite atrial activity. VT should be presumed until proven otherwise.


In patients with underlying heart disease — VT is far more common than SVT (SupraVentricular Tachycardia) with either preexisting bundle branch block or aberrant conduction. For this reason, and because VT is potentially life-threatening — VT should always be presumed as the cause of a regular WCT until proven otherwise (See ECG Blog #23 for review of the approach to a regular WCT).
  • NOTE: Some patients tolerate VT surprisingly well. Such patients may remain awake and alert for hours (or longer) despite being in persistent VT. Therefore — finding that your patient is alert with normal (or even increased) blood pressure in no way rules out the possibility that the rhythm is sustained VT.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Diagnosis of WCT rhythms becomes especially challenging when the rhythm is irregular and definable atrial activity is not seen during the tachycardia. Four examples of this are shown below in Figures 1, 2, 3, and 4. Imagine the patient is hemodynamically stable in each case, and that you are forced to make a diagnosis without the benefit of a 12-lead ECG obtained during the tachycardia. Match the rhythms shown in Figures 2-thru-5 to the following answer choices:
     a) Ventricular tachycardia.
     b) Atrial fibrillation with bundle branch block.
     c) Atrial fibrillation with WPW.
     d) Torsades de pointes.

----------------------------------------------------------------
4 Irregular WCT Rhythms: Match the 4 irregular WCT rhythms below (in Figures 2-thru-5) to one of the above 4 answer choices:
----------------------------------------------------------------
Figure 2: Irregular WCT without atrial activity.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Figure 3: An initial sinus beat or two — then an irregular WCT without atrial activity.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Figure 4: Irregular WCT without atrial activity.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Figure 5: Three initial sinus beats — then an irregular WCT without atrial activity. The tracing concludes with 2 sinus beats.
----------------------------------------------------------------



GENERAL NOTE:  Although definitive diagnosis of each of these 4 rhythms is difficult given the lack of prior tracings and absence of a 12-lead ECG obtained during tachycardia — one should still be able to establish a high-probability diagnosis for each rhythm strip. Being able to do so will often be important clinically — when there may not be sufficient time to obtain more history — compare with prior tracings — and get a 12-lead during tachycardia. Optimal treatment choices vary tremendously depending on what the irregular WCT is likely to be.

----------------------------------------------------------------
ANSWER to Figure 2:  Although subtle — the rhythm in Figure 2 is in fact irregularly irregular. The QRS is wide. An occasional undulation in the baseline is seen — but there are no definite P waves. We therefore strongly suspect atrial fibrillation (AFib) as the diagnosis — here with a rapid ventricular response.
  • Although VT is not always a perfectly regular rhythm — it usually does not vary from one beat to the next as seen here. This is the finding that strongly suggests AFib as the diagnosis. That said — this example highlights the point that when AFib is rapid — variability in the R-R interval between one beat and the next may be minimal (and at times require use of calipers for confirmation).
  • We say that the ventricular response of AFib in this example is “rapid” — because R-R intervals in Figure 2 are between 2-to-3 large boxes in duration (closer to the former). Thus, heart rate is in the range of 120-130/minute.
  • QRS morphology in this right-sided lead V1 is consistent with LBBB (Left Bundle Branch Block). This was confirmed by the 12-lead tracing shown below, obtained from this patient at the time of the lead V1 rhythm strip (Fig. 2-ANS).
Figure 2 – Irregular WCT without atrial activity. 

The type of bundle branch block is diagnosed by assessment of QRS morphology in the 3 KEY leads = Leads I,V1,V6 (See ECG Blog #3 - Blog #11 — and Blog #13). The monophasic upright QRS in left-sided leads I,V6 of Fig. 2-ANS — in association with the predominantly negative QRS in right-sided lead V1 is consistent with the diagnosis of typical LBBB.
  • Confirmation that the irregular WCT in Figure 2 is in fact AFib with QRS widening from preexisting bundle branch block was forthcoming from comparison with a prior 12-lead ECG on this patient that showed similar irregularity with identical QRS morphology due to this patient’s chronic LBBB.

Figure 2-ANS: 12-lead ECG from the patient’s whose lead V1 rhythm strip was shown in Figure 2.  The rhythm is rapid AFib. QRS widening is due to LBBB.
Clinical Note: As opposed to RBBB (Right Bundle Branch Block) — patients with chronic LBBB almost invariably have significant underlying heart disease. Thus, a very common clinical scenario predisposing to the rhythm seen in Figure 2 is heart failure (resulting from loss of the atrial kick) due to new-onset AFib with a rapid ventricular response in a patient with underlying LBBB.
  • Treatment of new-onset rapid AFib entails (whenever possible) correction of precipitating causes (such as heart failure) — and — slowing the ventricular response with AV nodal blocking drugs (verapamil-diltiazem-β-blockers-digoxin).

----------------------------------------------------------------
ANSWER to Figure 3:  The 1st and 3rd beats in Figure 3 appear to be sinus conducted. We suspect the 2nd complex is a fusion beat manifesting a QRS morphology intermediate between the two sinus beats and the initial part of the irregular WCT that follows.
  • A useful classification of WCT rhythms separates them into those that are monomorphic (with similar QRS morphology during the tachycardia) vs those that are polymorphic (in which QRS morphology varies).

Figure 3: An initial sinus beat or two — then an irregular WCT without atrial activity.
Beginning with the 4th beat in Figure 3 — a very rapid irregular WCT without atrial activity is seen. QRS morphology varies almost from beat-to-beat. This is polymorphic VT.
  • Torsades de Pointes – is defined as polymorphic VT that occurs in association with a long QT interval on baseline ECG. The very rapid irregular WCT seen in Figure 3 clearly manifests the shifting QRS polarity around the baseline (“twisting of the points”) that is characteristic of Torsades. However, whether the QT of the sinus beats seen in Figure 3 is prolonged – is suspected but not at all clear from the indistinct boundaries of the terminal part of the T wave …
  • Technically: Identification of polymorphic VT in the absence of QT prolongation is simply termed, “polymorphic VT”. As opposed to the multifactorial etiology of Torsades (drug-induced, electrolyte depletion, CNS disturbance or other underlying disorder that may predispose to QT lengthening) — polymorphic VT without QT lengthening most often has an ischemic etiology.
  • Clinically: Torsades de Pointes (= polymorphic VT with long QT) — responds extremely well to IV Magnesium. Although IV magnesium is also indicated as initial treatment of polymorphic VT with a normal QT — it is clearly less likely to respond than when the QT interval is prolonged. Instead — antiarrhythmic drugs such as amiodarone or β–blockers may be needed for treatment.
Definitive diagnosis of the irregular WCT seen in Figure 3 is forthcoming from an expanded look at this rhythm (Figure 3-ANS).

    Figure 3-ANS: Expansion of the rhythm seen in Figure 3. This is Torsades de Pointes.


    The easiest way to look at the lead II rhythm strip shown in Fig. 3-ANS — is to step back a bit from the tracing. Doing so allows full appreciation of the characteristic alternating polarity of QRS complexes around the baseline during the irregular WCT.
    • Note in the magnified view of the first few beats (Fig. 3-ANS-2) that the QT interval is in fact prolonged (ie, more than half the R-R interval) — confirming that the example of polymorphic VT in Figure 3 is indeed Torsades (See Basic Concepts #2 beginning with Figure-9 for brief review on assessing the QT interval).

    Figure 3-ANS-2: Magnification of the first few beats of Fig-3-ANS. The baseline QT interval is prolonged; it comprises more than half the R-R interval for each of the first 2 sinus beats.


    NOTE: Electricity may be needed. That is — IF the patient in polymorphic VT is (or at any time becomes) hemodynamically unstable — immediate shock is indicated. Because of the continuously variable nature of the QRS complex during the tachycardia — synchronized cardioversion will usually not be possible. As a result — unsynchronized shock (ie, defibrillation) is recommended if the patient is unstable.

    • Polymorphic VT often recurs — especially if an uncorrected predisposing cause is present. Repeated shock may be needed while efforts are made to determine and correct any underlying causes.
    • Recognition of a prolonged QT on baseline ECG of such patients suggests a likely contribution from drug- or electrolyte-induced QT prolongation. Hopefully — IV Magnesium will reverse the disorder and prevent subsequent episodes. Efforts addressed at treating ischemia may be helpful in treating polymorphic VT when the QT is normal.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    ANSWER to Figure 4:  The QRS complex is monophasic, albeit with some variation in the height of the QRS. The rhythm is irregularly irregular with marked variability in the R-R interval from one beat to the next. No atrial activity is seen. Although the QRS is clearly widened — the gross irregularity of the rhythm makes VT unlikely. This leaves atrial fibrillation (AFib) as the probable diagnosis (See ECG Blog #18).

    Figure 4: Irregular WCT without atrial activity.

    The KEY point in interpreting this rhythm is appreciation of the exceedingly rapid ventricular response — which is far faster than that usually seen with atrial fibrillation.
    • Under normal conditions with AFib – the refractory period of the AV node does not allow more than 150-to-200 impulses/minute to be conducted to the ventricles. At certain points in Figure 4 — the R-R interval is just over one large box in duration (which corresponds to a heart rate of ~250/minute) This is simply too fast for atrial impulses to be transmitted over the normal (AV nodal) conduction pathway.
    Conclusion: Atrial impulses must be bypassing the AV node. The finding of AFib at an exceedingly rapid rate (over ~220/minute) should immediately suggest the likelihood of accessory (AP) pathway conduction in a patient with WPW (Wolff-Parksinson-White) syndrome (See ECG Blog #18 for review of tachyarrhythmias with WPW).
    • The example of AFib seen in Figure 4 can easily be distinguished from the much more common variety of rapid AFib that conducts over the normal AV nodal pathway by the rate. Suspect AFib with WPW whenever you encounter an excessively rapid and irregular WCT (>220/minute in parts of the tracing) without evidence of atrial activity.
    • Clinically: The importance of distinguishing the common form of rapid AFib seen in Figure 2 from the excessively rapid form due to WPW (Figure 4) — lies with recommendations for treatment. The usual AV nodal blocking drugs recommended for controlling the ventricular response of rapid AFib are contraindicated when AFib occurs in association with WPW. Thus — verapamil, diltiazem, digoxin (and possibly β–blockers) may all potentially accelerate forward conduction down the AP, thereby further increasing the rate of this already exceedingly rapid rhythm and predisposing to deterioration to ventricular fibrillation.
    • Recommended treatment of very rapid AFib that occurs in association with WPW includes amiodarone, procainamide, and ibutilide. Immediate cardioversion is indicated if hemodynamic decompensation occurs at any time during the treatment process.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------

    ANSWER to Figure 5:  The initial 3 beats are sinus in this V1 rhythm strip. Then follows a rapid irregular WCT. This represents a run of monomorphic VT, albeit with more irregularity in the rhythm than is usually seen in VT.
    • Reasons in support of a ventricular etiology for the run of WCT seen in Figure 5 include abrupt onset of QRS widening with a QRS complex that is completely different in morphology than seen for the sinus conducted beats.
    • Presence of a post-ectopic pause following the run (less commonly seen following SVT).
    • Lack of a premature P wave preceding the run of WCT.
    • High statistical likelihood that a WCT such as is seen in Figure 5 is VT rather than SVT with preexisting bundle branch block or aberrant conduction.

    Figure 5: Three initial sinus beats — then an irregular WCT without atrial activity — followed by 2 sinus beats at the end of the tracing.


    PEARL: We added this last example (Figure 5) as a contrast to the regular WCT in Figure 1 to emphasize the point that VT is not always completely regular.
    • Most of the time — any irregularity seen with VT will be minimal.
    • On occasion, there may either be a “warm-up” or “cool-down” phenomenon — in which the initial few beats of the VT run will either gradually speed up or slow down until a fairly regular R-R interval is established. A “cool-down” period is seen in Figure 5 (manifest by slowing of the VT rate after the first few beats).
    • The irregular WCT in Figure 5 is not AFib with WPW.  As opposed to Figure 4 — Figure 5 begins and ends with sinus-conducted beats. In between is a monomorphic WCT of very different morphology without atrial activity. This is VT.
    • The irregular WCT in Figure 5 is not Torsades because it is not polymorphic. Instead we see a run of monomorphic WCT consistent with conventional VT.

    Clinically: The importance of identifying the irregular WCT seen in Figure 5 as VT lies with recommendations for treatment. Favored antiararhythmic options for monomorphic VT include amiodarone — procainamide — sotalol. This is very different than the recommended treatment for Torsades or AFib with QRS widening from aberrant conduction or WPW.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------

    — See ECG Blog #18, Blog #23, Blog #24 and Blog #37 —
     — See also these pdfs excerpted from our ACLS-2013-ePub on Known VT – Torsades de Points — Very rapid AFib with WPW – 
    ----------------------------------------------------------------

    Monday, January 16, 2012

    ECG Blog #35 — Will Adenosine Work?

    You are given the 12-lead ECG shown in Figure 1 and told it is from a previously healthy 30-year-old man who just presented to the emergency department with new-onset palpitations. No prior ECG is available for comparison. The patient is alert and hemodynamically stable with a BP = 150/90 mmHg. What is the rhythm? Is this rhythm likely to respond to adenosine?

    Figure 1 – 12-lead ECG from a 30-year-old man with palpitations.
    Is adenosine likely to convert this rhythm? 



    INTERPRETATION: The rhythm is rapid and regular at a rate of ~180/minute. The QRS complex is obviously wide. No P waves are seen. Thus, the rhythm is a regular WCT (Wide-Complex Tachycardia) without clear sign of atrial activity. VT (Ventricular Tachycardia) must be assumed until proven otherwise!
    • As previously emphasized on ECG Blog #23 – VT is by far the most common cause of a regular WCT when there is no sign of atrial activity (accounting for >80% of cases). The bizarre axis deviation during tachycardia in Figure 1 makes diagnosis of VT a virtual certainty.

    ===========================
    TREATMENT of Sustained VT: Clinical management of sustained VT depends on the setting in which it occurs. It is easiest to use assessment of hemodynamic status when contemplating how best to proceed: 
    • IF there is No Pulse in association with sustained VT – Treat the same as for ventricular fibrillation (= immediate unsynchronized countershock). 
    • IF there is a pulse, but the patient is hemodynamically unstable (hypotensive, having chest pain, shortness of breath or mental confusion) – there is no time to lose. As a result – immediate synchronized cardioversion is in order. 
    • But IF the patient with sustained VT is hemodynamically stable – then there is at least a moment of time to contemplate options and initiate a trial of antiarrhythmic therapy.
    Much has been written about ACLS recommendations for the treatment of sustained VT (See this pdf from Section 07.0 on Known VT excerpted from ( our ACLS-2013-ePub). For the patient who is hemodynamically stable – amiodarone is usually the first antiarrhythmic agent tried. Other medical options for treatment of sustained stable VT include procainamide, lidocaine, magnesium, and beta-blockers (depending on clinical circumstances). Not generally appreciated is the potential role of adenosine in the management of known VT – for WCT of uncertain etiology – and especially for the clinical situation posed by this theoretical case scenario for which adenosine may be the agent of choice.
    • Adenosine is an emergency treatment of choice for supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. One or two doses of the drug is successful in converting over 90% of reentrant PSVT. 
    • Even when adenosine does not convert a supraventricular tachyarrhythmia – it may assist diagnostically as a form of “chemical valsalva” by transiently slowing the ventricular response. This may facilitate recognition of “telltale” atrial activity – thereby allowing definitive diagnosis of the rhythm. 
    • Because of its ultra-short half-life (less than 10 seconds! ) – adverse effects produced by IV adenosine are usually short-lived. As a result – the drug has been used in the management approach to a regular WCT of uncertain etiology. Traditionally, it has been thought that IF the WCT is supraventricular in etiology (SVT with either aberrant conduction or preexisting bundle branch block) – then adenosine is likely to either convert the rhythm or transiently slow the ventricular response enough to allow definitive diagnosis. On the other hand, if the WCT is VT – then adenosine will not be effective (but because of its ultra-short half-life – the drug will almost always be reasonably well tolerated without lasting adverse effect). 
    Adenosine-Responsive VT: Recent appreciation of a number of adenosine-responsive forms of VT mandate modification of previous thinking. Although most often associated with RVOT (Right Ventricular Outflow Track) VT – a number of other adenosine-responsive forms of VT have been identified, including forms that are associated with ischemia and fascicular WCT. The proposed mechanism of action of adenosine in these nonreentrant catecholamine-mediated forms of VT is thought to relate to adenosine receptor inhibition of adenylate cyclase, as well as modulation in autonomic tone.
    • RVOT VT is suggested by the finding of VT with LBBB-type precordial lead morphology in association with an inferior axis (with positive QRS complexes in II,III,aVF indicative of a superior origin for the impulse). This ECG picture is seen in Figure 1. Clinical characteristics of RVOT VT are typically similar to that in this case (a patient ~20-40 years old; lack of underlying structural heart disease; precipitation of symptoms with exercise, stress, caffeine intake or other catecholamine-mediated activity).

    ----------------------------------------------------
    BOTTOM LINE: Overall – adenosine-responsive VT makes up a minority of VT cases. That said – determination of the true prevalence of this entity is challenging, and determined in great part by the associated clinical circumstances of the case at hand. This diagnosis should be suspected when a previously healthy young adult presents with a WCT precipitated by exercise, stress, or other catecholamine-mediated activity. This is especially true if the WCT manifests precordial lead LBBB-type morphology in association with an inferior axis (as in Figure 1). However, given the heterogeneous nature of adenosine-responsive VT – other QRS morphologies may certainly be seen. One therefore cannot reliably predict from assessment of the ECG which patients with VT are likely to respond to adenosine.
    • Appreciation of the entity of adenosine-responsive VT provides a rationale for earlier empiric inclusion of adenosine in the treatment approach to both WCT of uncertain etiology as well as for presumed new-onset VT.
    • Adenosine is likely to convert those WCTs due to reentrant PSVT with either aberrant conduction or preexisting bundle branch block. It may also convert a small (but not insignificant) percentage of cases of VT that are adenosine-responsive.
    • Response of a WCT to treatment with adenosine should no longer be taken as reliable indication that the WCT was supraventricular (since it may have been due to an adenosine-responsive form of VT). These patients with WCT that responds to adenosine should be referred for electrophysiologic evaluation of their rhythm disturbance.

    ----------------------------------------------------
    REFERENCES: 
    1. Markowitz SM, Litvak BL, Lerman BB, et al: Adenosine-sensitive VT Right Ventricular Abnormalities Delineated by MRI. Circulation 96:1192-1200, 1997. 
    2. Lerman BB, Belardinelli L, West AG, et al: Adenosine-sensitive Ventricular Tachycardia: Evidence Suggesting Cyclic AMP-mediated Triggered Activity. Circulation 74:270-280, 1986.
    3. Jane-Wit D et al: Ischemic Etiology for Adenosine-Sensitive Fascicular Tachycardia. J Electrocardiol 44(2):217-221, 2011. 
    4. Srivathsan K, Lester SJ, Appleton CP: Ventricular Tachycardia in the Absence of Structural Heart Disease. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 5:106-121, 2005. 
    ---------------------------------------------------- 
    - See ECG Blogs #23 - #24 and #38 –  
    ----------------------------------------------------

    Wednesday, January 4, 2012

    ECG Interpretation Review #34 (Acute MI - vs Nonspecific Changes - ST Elevation/Depression)

    The 12-lead ECG shown in Figure 1 was obtained from a 72-year-old woman seen in the ED (emergency department) with new-onset chest discomfort.  No prior ECGs were available for comparison.  The tracing was interpreted as “showing no acute changes”.  Do you agree?  What else do you see?
    Figure 1 – 12-lead ECG from a 72-year-old woman with new-onset chest discomfort.  
    Do you agree that there are “no acute changes”?  
    – NOTE – Enlarge by clicking on Figures – Right-Click to open in a separate window.
    INTERPRETATION:  The rhythm is sinus at a rate of ~75/minute.  All intervals and the axis are normal.  There is no chamber enlargement.  With regard to Q-R-S-T Changes – there are several findings of note:
    • There are Q waves (QS complexes) in anteroseptal leads V1-thru-V3.  A small positive deflection (r wave) finally develops by lead V4.  Thus, transition is delayed (only occurring between leads V4-to-V5).
    • There is subtle (but real) ST segment elevation in lead aVL.
    • Support that the subtle ST elevation in aVL is a real finding is forthcoming from the ST segment flattening and subtle (but real) ST depression seen in each of the inferior leads (II,III,aVF).
    CLINICAL IMPRESSION:  Given the clinical history of a 72-year-old woman presenting to the ED with new-onset chest discomfort and no prior tracing available for comparison – the findings in Figure 1 are clearly of concern.  Lack of any r wave at all until lead V4 suggests prior anteroseptal infarction.  The subtle (but real) ST elevation in lead aVL with equally subtle (but real) “reciprocal changes” in leads II, III and aVF suggest that the patient may be in process of evolving an acute high lateral MI (myocardial infarction).
    • IF this patient is truly in process of evolving an acute STEMI (ST-Elevation MI) – this should be known shortly.  ECG changes of acute MI may evolve quickly – sometimes in less than an hour.  We would repeat the 12-lead ECG in short order.
    • Of the 5 lateral leads (I,aVL; V4,V5,V6) – lead aVL views the heart from the highest and most peripheral perspective (looking down at the heart from the left shoulder).  As a result – lead aVL may sometimes be the only lateral lead to show acute changes (as may be the case in Figure 1 … ).
    -------------------------------------------------
    ADDITIONAL POINTS ABOUT ASSESSING SUBTLE ST-T WAVE CHANGES:
    Determining ST-T wave changes is essential to ECG interpretation.  It is with respect to the PR segment that ST segment deviations (elevation or depression) are judged (Figure 2).  The PR segment is the connecting line that extends from the end of the P wave – until the beginning of the QRS complex.  We define:
    • ST Elevation – IF the ST is above the PR baseline.
    • ST Depression – IF the ST is below the PR baseline.
    NOTE:  The PR baseline is more difficult to see when the heart rate is faster (the PR shortens with tachycardia).  It may be especially challenging to identify the PR baseline when there is baseline wander …
    Figure 2 – Use of the PR segment baseline to assess for ST segment deviations. 
    (Figure reproduced from ECG-2014-ePub - pg 46).
    As noted – the changes in the 12-lead ECG shown in Figure 1 are subtle.
    • The shape of ST elevation is more important than the amount of elevation.  Acute MI may occur with only minimal ST elevation.
    • History is ever important.  The fact that the patient in this case is of a certain age (72 years old) and that she presents to the ED with new-onset chest discomfort places the onus on us to prove that she is not presenting with ACS (acute coronary syndrome) rather than the other way around.
    In Figure 3 – we blow-up the key leads of concern.  Although the amount of ST segment deviation (above and below the baseline) is not a lot – careful attention to the PR segment baseline (horizontal red lines in Figure 3) reveals that there is ST elevation in lead aVL and reciprocal ST depression in II, III and aVF.
    Figure 3 – Blow-up of leads II,III,aVL,aVF from Figure 1.  
    – NOTE – Enlarge by clicking on Figures – Right-Click to open in a separate window.
    ------------------------------
    BOTTOM LINE:  We admittedly are in no way certain that the patient in this case is in process of evolving an acute high-lateral MI.  However, in view of the history and the ECG changes described above – we have to assume this is occurring until proven otherwise.  Careful observation – presumptive initial treatment measures – serum troponins – repeating the ECG in short order – and a little bit of time should suffice to clarify the true picture.
    ----------------------------------------------------
    - See ECG Blogs #6 and #7 – and this pdf on ST-T wave changes from Section 09.0 of our ECG-2014-ePub.
    ----------------------------------------------------